What is a potential outcome when not activating security policy changes?

When security policy changes are not activated, the most significant outcome is the inability to enforce necessary access restrictions. This can lead to a variety of security issues within the system. Without the activation of updated security policies, users may retain access to information or functionalities that should be restricted based on their roles or responsibilities. This can expose sensitive data to unauthorized individuals and increase the risk of security breaches.

Furthermore, failing to implement updated security policies can compromise compliance with regulatory standards, which often mandate specific access controls and data protection measures. The effectiveness of the entire security framework relies on the active enforcement of policies designed to protect the organization's information assets.

While the other options might seem appealing, they do not align with the reality of unactivated security policy changes. For instance, a complete security overhaul or improvements in system performance are not direct results of inaction regarding security policies. Similarly, increased user satisfaction typically depends on appropriate access, which cannot be ensured if security policies are not enforced. Thus, the correct understanding focuses on the critical necessity of activating security policy changes to maintain robust security and operational integrity.